Common NDA Red Flags: What to Watch For
Skip the reading? Upload your contract and get an AI analysis in 60 seconds.
NDA Review Tool →What NDAs Are Designed to Do
Non-disclosure agreements protect legitimately confidential information — trade secrets, proprietary processes, client lists, unreleased product details. A well-drafted NDA is a reasonable part of most business relationships.
The problem is that NDAs are frequently used overbroadly: to silence employees about workplace conditions, to prevent workers from using general industry knowledge, or to create indefinite confidentiality obligations that outlive their purpose.
Six NDA Clauses That Deserve Scrutiny
1. Overly broad definition of "confidential information"
"All information shared or discussed" is nearly unlimited. A reasonable NDA defines confidential information specifically — marked documents, designated categories, trade secrets. Unlimited scope can prevent you from discussing your general professional experience.
2. No exclusions for public information
Standard NDAs exclude information that's already public, independently developed, or received from a third party without restriction. If your NDA lacks these exclusions, it may attempt to claim confidentiality over information anyone can Google.
3. Excessive duration
Most legitimate NDAs last 2–5 years for general confidential information; trade secrets can be indefinite. An NDA requiring lifetime confidentiality for general business discussions is unusual and may be unenforceable.
4. One-way obligations only
If you're sharing your confidential information with the other party, a mutual NDA protects both sides. A one-way NDA that only binds you — when you're sharing equally — is worth negotiating.
5. Restrictions on discussing wages, working conditions, or protected conduct
In the U.S., the National Labor Relations Act protects employees' rights to discuss wages and working conditions. NDAs cannot legally prohibit this. Some states have additional protections against NDAs that silence reports of illegal workplace activity.
6. Indemnification without cap
Some NDAs require the disclosing party to indemnify the other for any breach damages with no cap. This can expose you to unlimited liability for an inadvertent disclosure. Capped indemnification tied to actual proven damages is more reasonable.
How to Approach NDA Negotiation
Asking for NDA modifications is normal and expected in professional contexts. Common reasonable asks: narrow the definition of confidential information, add standard exclusions, shorten the term, make it mutual, exclude legally protected discussions.
If a counterparty refuses any changes to a sweeping NDA, that tells you something about how they approach the underlying business relationship.
Not legal advice. This article is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and is not a substitute for consultation with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. Laws vary significantly by state and country.
Related guides
What to Check in an Employment Contract
Employment contracts contain clauses that affect your career for years after signing. Here's what to actually read — and what to push back on.
Freelance Contract Mistakes
Most freelance disputes trace back to contract language written (or missing) before the project started. Here's what to get right.
Analyze your contract now
Upload any contract and get a full risk analysis in 60 seconds. Free preview, $19 to unlock.
NDA Review Tool →No account required · Encrypted in transit · Results in 60 seconds